No to death penalty

Day before yesterday is one of the blackest days for India. We have perpetuated the act of "state killing". The 'alleged' people from Delhi gang rape were imposed the death sentence. My point of view is that we should not kill someone merely for the crimes they commit. Rather, attempts should be made to reform them.
Death is not the answer. "Life" is the answer. They should be given a life a life of 'another chance'.
Now, the way all the protest happened like huge banners proclaiming "death to rapists" and no one will protest as "life to rapists". Why?, because their entire effort of the earlier protest will "go waste".
But human rights are important. We are human beings and we should learn that lives are not ours to take it away. Life is a 'divine creation'. Act of taking a life should be left to God alone. No matter what the cost.
And for all the protest which happened for the Delhi gang rape case where did all the funds come from? No doubt all the funds came from abroad. The very lands which want to dominate India and want to shape the future of the one and quarter billion people. They divert the attention of the country folk and channel all the efforts of the young India into a path which they are led into.
As bestgore website had coined a term "sheep" or sheeple = sheep + people. And these 'sheeple' follow a 'herd mentality'. If anyone goes against them and their 'herd mentality' they are termed as traitors or inhuman or terrorists and stuff. Terms may be short but these 'sheeple' feel they are always right.
Now so much of gang rape coverage was given in the media, where would that leave the 'really young' people. They got a 'way more information' then what their parents or their elders would have wanted. They not only came to know what 'rape' is but they also knew about 'rape and murder' as well as about 'gang rape'. Because everywhere the news blew up right on their faces. It was everywhere, in TV, newspapers, magazines, radio, discussions, social media as well as protest in the streets. Will those 'really young people' be scared by this death penalty? I don't think so. Young blood is young blood. It will continue to 'pump hard'. Since we are mammals we continue to get attracted to the opposite sex. We can watch the Discovery Channels and Animal Planet channel to know how all species try to 'woo their mates' and 'indulge in courtship' and becomes a "case of competition".
I will say that the world is not a good place. But we don't need to make it worse.

Death penalty is bad. Needs to be abolished.

This post is to air my view that death penalty is bad and should be banned. Agreed that people do bad things. But they should not be punished by death.
The job of the Govt. is to protect its citizens whether they are black or white, good or bad, ugly or beautiful, whatever language, sex or religion. Govt. should protect all. Especially it should not kill its own people.
Alternates are there like prison, manual labour or banishing them to an island.
No killing please. Killing one who wants to live and killing innocent people is the worst one can do or imagine.
If you really want to kill someone, the one who should be killed is the one who does not want to live. My ultimate desire and wish is that no human should kill another human especially not the Govt. which should protect its citizens 'come what may'.
The act of death should be left to God and "Nature" which are all powerful and humans are mere 'toys' in front of them.

US fall from grace

There was a time when US used to be the most powerful county in the world. Countries around the world would look up to the US for guidance. Now where is US. Far from being the most admired country in the world it has fallen to the status of worst country in the world It is indulging in fight a tiny minuscle country like Iraq and Syria.
Also, let us not speak of the Afghanistan invasion. In the case of Afghanistan, there is an invasion and occupation. And what an invasion. There is no parallel in the world. Maybe the 1991 Gulf war has that similarities. But the aim of that Gulf war was to drive Saddam Hussein from Kuwait and that was it. But in the case of Afghanistan the most powerful military alliance in the world (NATO) has invaded , occupied and murdered innocent Afghanis using high end equipment.
The NATO countries are rich and very rich and Afghans are poor and still they have to 'beat a hasty retreat' ultimately. Else it will be a new kind of 'imperialism' where entire countries are dictated by "common selfish interest" to "rule over innocent people in a foreign land".
There is no 'white mans burden' here. The white man is the 'burden'. The white man is the 'burden on this earth'.
Of what use is this equipment if it is only intended to kill, destroy and maim people?
And what is the expenditure they incur? Per month they spend billions of dollars just to maintain the force in a foreign land. They are foreigners and they cannot change the fact. No matter what they do.
The billions of dollars they spend on 'killing machines' is better spent on 'clean drinking water' or 'education'.
Just looking as this makes us realise that this world is the only place we have. there was never a 'moon landing' and the Star Wars and Star Trek series are 'mere fiction'. Mankind or the more preferable 'humanity' has no where to go but this planet. "We have to live and die in this earth itself". Like in Raj Kapoor movie "Jeena yahan marna yahan, iske siva jana kahan".
 

Two more movies

Watched two more movies. "Well done Abba"For this movie, I would like to say well done. Too good movie and captures the Hyderabad rural setting almost close to perfect. Needless to say, it captures the difficulty the Indian rural folk have to undergo in a fun manner. "Fida". I liked this movie. Shahid Kapoor is a good performer and a deserving star according to me.

Airtel broadband Smartbytes

I am a user of Airtel broadband and Airtel. I first came across Airtel when I went to Chennai in June 2002. Just when I stepped out of Chennai Central station there was a huge advertising board/ bilboard where the mobile ad of Airtel was displayed. At that time I did not have mobile.
Earlier to that I had never heard of Airtel. In Bombay/Mumbai, there was VSNL and MTNL. Then it was a matter of time before the entire VSNL organisation was "sold off" to the Tatas by the politicians.
VSNL did not remain VSNL, it slowly got converted into a 'private sector organisation' the owner were the Tatas. Politicians merely became the rubber stamps to 'sell it off' the way Tata demanded.
Then I left Mumbai in 2002 and went to my hometown and then proceeded to Chennai. When I went to Chennai, initially, I did observe a lot of 'towers'. Actually in the use of mobiles, South India was 'more forward' than North India in 2002. Along with the use of mobiles came the installation of towers. Because without those 'towers', mobile network and mobiles will not work.
These days there are 'mobile towers all over India'. Mobile network has expanded throughout the wide spectrum of the Indian populace.
Now in Chennai I did not take mobile. I still relied on landline and PCO's from where you could dial STD/ISD. In Mumbai in 2002, my father had given me a mobile but during one night talk the entire 'talktime' got erased. It got erased because the 'call rates' were so high.
I got my next mobile in early 2004. It was Reliance Telecom mobile. It was Odisha number. But when I came to Bengaluru in 2004, I returned the Reliance mobile to my father and took a new SIM card in Bengaluru. And that SIM belonged to Airtel. The phone was the original Nokia phone (that dark blue phone with green background screen and black and white). In 2005, I bought a Sony Ericsson phone. In 2007, I bought another Nokia phone (6630 model). In May 2008, I bought Nokia N82. In Dec 2010, I bought Samsung Galaxy Tab. In Sep 2011, I bought Nokia C2-03. And then in Sep 2012 I have bought Nokia Lumia 610. And this is my current phone.
Meanwhile I took Airtel broadband in April 2006. Initially I used to watch music videos. When Airtel increased its speed from 256 kbps to 1 Mbps, I began watching movies. Because I did not download the movies but watched it in streaming mode. And since 2007, I have observed that a speed of at least 512 kbps is required for youtube videos. I remember I started watching movies only starting May 2008 or around that time.
Airtel is good, service is good. But they introduced the FUP plan after taking cue from the mobile internet. I have a limit of 10 GB. And since two months when my FUP is over i.e. 10 GB a site loads automatically if I want to 'puchase high speed data'. After a two day deliberation, day before yesterday I purchased 25 GB data. And I must tell the service and concept is excellent. I really like this smartbytes system. Also, if we visit the smartbytes site we can see how much data we have used and how much is still available.

Formation of Odisha, Bihar and Pakistan

I have found out that the formation of Pakistan has direct relation to the formation of Orissa, Assam and Bihar in 1936. This also synonymous to what the British followed in Pre-Independence India namely the 'divide and rule' policy. British knew that the province of Bengal was a 'hotbed of Indian nationalism'.Assam, Bihar and Orissa were provinces of Bengal. Way back, if we refer to the history textbooks we know that policy to divide Bengal began in 1905.
The British wanted to "punish Bengal" for being a 'hotbed of Indian nationalism' and hence the divisions and sub-divisions again and again. Also there is the case of neglect during floods and famines which resulted in millions of deaths in pre-independence Bengal province.
Though in 1905, the division was due to administrative reasons. Entire present day North East and Bangladesh as well as West Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand and Orissa was part of Bengal in 1905.
British divided it into 'West Bengal' and 'East Bengal' in 1905. Subsequently in 1936-1937 they separated Assam, Bihar and Orissa from Bengal. Remember that this was before India got independence.
These were separated on 'linguistic lines'. Subsequently from this 'separation' the Muslim League got 'its inspiration' and raised its demand for a separate 'Pakistan for Muslims' based on religious lines. Subsequently, the states of Maharashtra, Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh as well as Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala were formed in 1956 and that was 'post independence'. This further proved to Pakistanis that M.A.Jinnah was right in demanding Pakistan from India as Indians were 'a divided lot' and there is no harm in asking for "Sadda Haq" or 'my/our own right' so to speak.
But here was a catch, Pakistan also felt into this trap and that was East Pakistan, they also wanted their own 'land' and so they revolted against their 'rulers' from 'West' i.e. West Pakistan. Again the division or the sub-division (division post division) was on the basis of 'language and race' and after a conflict which was "partly orchestrated and fully executed" by India, East Pakistan became Bangladesh.
Thus my line is that the formation of Pakistan has its origins within India itself where other regional movements provided the impetus for it to get formed. Still those partition was not enough. Jharkhand was formed from Bihar in 2000. Several states were formed from Assam post Independence over decades which have given rise to so called "sister states of North East". In South India, Telangana is already declared to be formed from Andhra Pradesh. Even now there are movements in Assam proper for further division of the state as well as movement in West Bengal for Gorkhaland as well as in Western Orissa for a smaller state.

Michael Jackson vs Percy Jackson and Obama

Watched Percy Jackson:Sea of Monsters yesterday. Could not help but recollect Michael Jackson in the process as Percy Jackson was being called 'Jackson-Jackson' in the movie.
Michael Jackson and Percy Jackson, these are two characters in the world. Michael Jackson was 'a real person' where as Percy Jackson is a 'character of fiction'. Michael Jackson came into the limelight in the 1970's and right up-to his death in 2009 he always 'stayed in the news'.
He was the "biggest pop-star of the world' for much of his career. Now the present day world is trying to 'erase the memory' of Michael Jackson by bringing in Percy Jackson who is 'white'. Michael Jackson was 'black' and he 'turned white' due to reasons unknown whether it was disease or medication or surgery we do not know. In Percy Jackson movie there is a 'black' character but he is relegated to the background. The 'hero' remains white for 'all to see'. Also, most of Percy Jackson friends are white. The movie is similar to "Hunger Games" as again in Hunger games there were a lot of 'young characters' and mostly or overwhelmingly 'white'. Parsi people i.e. Zoroastrians from Iran who have settled in India may think this movie is about "Parsi Jackson" but that is laughable.
The "white people" would obviously want their own 'white' people to prevail and they want to remove the 'black people' from focus. But they elected Obama and it was due to a variety of reasons that Obama got elected. During his first election, First was because his mother was white, second because he capitalised on the Recession which happened in US and World, third was due to 'never ending war' which Bush started in Afghanistan and continued in Iraq, fourth because lot of his 'foes' like John Edward got eliminated due to smear campaign by the Jew dominated press, fifth due to sympathy factor when it became a case of Hillary vs Obama and so on.
Obama re-election had other reasons. The lethargic people, namely people who want to live well-off without working hard like living off state benefits fell for him. Also he being of 'mixed race descent' gave a lot of fillip to the mixed race people so much that mixed race people now dominate everywhere from Judiciary to the Federal Govt. institutions. Mainly his support came from blacks, Hispanic and White women. Also, many people in US might have thought that the world would consider them "crazy" if they change the Govt once every four years. I mean changing the Govt. once every eight years would be acceptable to them but once every four years. There would be change in policy and Secretary and the way the Federal Govt is being run and it would make "America a joke" in the eyes of the world.
Now we know in US no man or person can be president for more than two terms. So we know that Obama cannot stay beyond 2016. And starting 2014 all the "struggle for the big seat" will start in US among both the parties Republicans and Democrats when they will begin their process of candidate selection. At that time the US Govt. actions will come into scrutiny by the potential candidates and the public. And this is for this reason that the 'Jewish lobby' and the 'Jew controlled press' want Obama to start the war against Syria because if there is delay America will not be able to begin the war due to internal political reasons.
Obama may start the war but he knows what he does 'his successor' would have to close. Also since Obama has made commitment to withdraw from Afghanistan by 2014, the US forces will need to be 're-located' as per "Obama 'Jew directed' plan". I cannot think why they cannot be 're-located' to the US. Is it necessary that they be 're-located' to another war, a war which is "Jew directed". Just like Jews control most of the film and entertainment industry, this also they control. i.e. where America will fight its next war. They also decide "which race needs to be wiped out" for their existence. In this case now they are fixated on the Syrians.