PM Modi's Mann Ki Baat

I will like to suggest PM Modi that make the Mann Ki Baat program a TV Program.
Tell me what is PM Modi afraid of.
When you make Mann Ki Baat as a Radio program it can only mean two things.
-->Either PM Modi is afraid to show his face to Indian Public while giving his 'Mann Ki Baat'.
Or -->His intentions are not well in the sense he wants to be a "Dictator like Figure'.
He wants to be beyond the reach of the people.
While coming to Red Fort and going to Silicon Valley and interacting with public is okay, showing the face to India while addressing the nation is not.
And why will he name it as "Mann Ki Baat' instead of as something simple as "PM's address to the nation'.
Thus what I feel that he thinks himself as greater than a Dictator even greater than God and his voice is the Voice from heavens. His Mind is greater than a God and his thoughts come from his mind i.e. the Mann and hence it becomes a "Talk of the Mind' .
Yes people, PM Modi thinks that PM title is also not enough for him and hence he does not say 'PM ki baat' and choses to say as 'Mann Ki Baat' which implies that only he has a Mann or brain and only he is allowed to speak and as public we are only allowed to listen to him.
It is the worst form of abuse of power and blatant display of Power.
We have seen earlier PM's from Rajiv Gandhi to Chandrasekhar to PV Narsimha Rao to IKGujral to Manmohan Singh all coming on TV and delivering their respective speeches.
The same speech would then be broadcasted on the radio.
Similar case happens during Independence Day and Republic Day addresses by President/Governors or PM/CM's. They give the sppech on TV and then the same is broadcasted on Radio whether with or without dubbing in the regional language. But this PM Modi thinks people cannot see him. And only listen to him. Like he is a God King like Ramses of Egypt.
PM Modi will go to Silicon Valley and speak about latest technologies but when it comes to something as simple as giving a lecture in person in front of the camera he will make himself dissapear and only make audio available.
I feel his intentions are not legitimate due to this. If PM Modi is reading this I will advice to make it a TV program no matter what the consequences. I am sure more people will respect him if they can actually see him and not just hear him. His reach will increase.

No UNSC for India

I will advise the world and the people of the world that there should not be any UNSC seat for India. India is a regional bully and takes sadistic pleasure in troubling peaceful people like Kashmiris who have been forced to be under occupation.
At the end of Second World War while countries around the world were getting 'free', India just tightened its grip in the Kashmir region. And it is not a decade or two. Over the decades the iron like grip has become tighter and tighter. It is like the grip is 'choking them'.
Also, it is virtually opposing Pakistan everywhere and stifling its growth.
While millions of Indians languish in poverty, India takes great pains to ensure its neighbour is in even greater pain.
There is no freedom in India. State after state and region after region is falling into the grip of the so called 'Hindu nationalists' who are nothing but 'Hardcore Hindu fundamentalists' and Fascists of the worst kind. For them it is like 'my way or the highway'. You have no option but to bow down to what these Hindu nationalists dictate else you may lose your life and job and everything else.
There are allegations of Indian involvement in arming and sponsoring terror in Pakistan which I feel Pakistan would be able to explain more in detail.
The democracy in India is a sham. There is no 'real democracy' with various bans in place. And every day newer and newer bans are coming. India is a nightmare country comparable to Sub-Saharan Africa and there should be no UNSC for India.

Hell Rule

We can say that RSS rule is same as Hell Rule.
I will refer here to what was a dialogue in the the movie "End of Days".
It will not be exact but you will get the essence. "He unlocks the gates of hell and everything as we know it ceases to exist".
In the movie it was referring to the Devil who wanted to father a child with the chosen one when the planetary alignment is just right.
In the Indian context we can say that RSS rule is already there by their own party BJP. And they are taking steps to usher in a so called Govt. and Governance system and through bans and various other steps they have undertaken over the past one and half year that "the world we know existed has ceased to exist".
Just like riots once they happen, things never go back to the way they used to be. Similarly people were used to things in a certain way and now post RSS Govt. they cannot do things that used to happen.
This is what is Hell rule.
They want Ram Rajya but this Kali Juga and in Kali Juga the Ram Rajya is not possible. What they will achieve is Hell Rule. I cannot find a suitable word and hence I am forced to use 'Hell Rule'.
In their so called Ram Rajya there are no Muslims and Christians. And Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh are all part of undivided India and all are Hindus.
Recently this BJP-RSS Govt. has made Hindus of Bangladesh and Pakistan as citizens of the country provided they have entered India before Dec.31, 2014. Now what is this date. It is like a BC/AD date. Before Christ/Anno Domini?
Also how can they selectively allow Hindus of their countries to become Indians while being violently opposed to Muslims of those counties. Is India not a Secular state? And through their infamous "Ghar Wapsi" program they want all immigrants to convert into Hinduism in other words.
Thus so called Ghar Wapsi is actually not just for People in India. It is also for the illegal immigrants also who will see benefit of converting to Hinduism and getting all benefits of becoming an Indian citizen.
Thus in other words RSS wants to convert people of all faiths into Hinduism. This is a very deadly operation and sugar coating it with words like "Ghar Wapsi" do not make it acceptable.
If their actions were genuine, all immigrants should be made Indians regardless of their faith and why just select Hindus whether they were escaping persecution or not. Any person can face persecution. It does not have to do anything with the religion and more to do with the time and place and circumstances.

Hindu Nationalists and West

The West cannot do anything to stop the Hindu nationalists.
Why?
Because the Hindu nationalists are too powerful and India is too big. And Complex.
Like what happened in Iraq or Afghanistan or Syria cannot happen in India.
Lets see what what happened in Iraq.
Iraq invaded Iran in 1980 with backing of west and carried out a massive war. When it could not win and was deeply in debt, its dictator Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990 and that led to its being isolated. And a coalition of nations bombed it into Stone Age so as to speak. But Saddam was till in power and so Bush junior engaged in war in 2003 to remove him.
The circle around Iraq already existed which the west and Turkey and Saudi Arabia and Israel though would be possible to be used in Syria. But they created a monster ISIL or ISIS and they thought by labelling it as "Islamic State" they can discredit Islam as a religion.
Next is Afghanistan. When Taliban came to power in 1996 for the first time, Afghanistan was in peace after long decades of war. Then when Taliban banned the production of Opium and moved away from World Bank and IMF, US and NATO attacked and occupied a sovereign country. Pakistan was already working with US during Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. But difference now was Pakistan was told to step aside and it was only a logistics base for NATO where the equipment was to be passed through.
Now India is too huge and complicated for US and its allies.
Britain did rule over India but ultimately when air travel and movies became a reality Britain had to bow down and move out of India. Also it was exhausted after Second World War. Also it was not a dictatorship and could not commit human rights abuses against innocent people. What it did in Iraq and Libya and through proxies in Syria was half a century later.
The West knows that "if you cannot beat them, join them". Since it cannot beat India, better to join India or support the regime whatever is there in power in India. It knows in India one has to live by Indian rules. Like they say "Bhaad mein jaye Indian people, Humara kaam hona mangta" means "Let Indian people face the music of THEIR Govt. why will be do anything about it, our work should be done".
If the Indian Govt. says that you do not do this, they (the West) follow it.

Dictatorship cometh

I will say it is the ultimate aim of BJP-RSS Parivar to usher in dictatorship. Several incidents have happened over the last few days and weeks which indicate it.
(1)Mainly they want to control the public through meat ban.
(2)Next they have removed stamps showing Rajiv Gandhi and Indira Gandhi. This is a way of erasing history.
(3)Then they attack people who are rationalists like one in Karnataka was shot in cold blood.
It is ultimate aim of RSS to project Modi as a "face or mask" as a leader but the truth is he is just that. He is a mask. Just like in elections Modi mask was available everywhere and he went on to bring massive numbers. Same could not happen under Advani and so he was quietly removed.
RSS is what I had read in Twitter by one user is the "Riot Sevak Sangh" and not "Rashtriya Sevak Sangh". What happens when riots happen in the country. Muslims suffer. Their homes and businesses are burnt and they go into camps or ghettos where people like them exist in large numbers and they find safety in numbers. RSS takes over existing areas in the garb of helping people they actually help carry out "ethnic clensing". And that is why they can be called as Riot Sevak Sangh. That is how it happens in riots.
RSS also hold camps or "Gatherings" or "Sabhas". It is like terrorist camps running right across the country but they are not terrorists officially. They are only "Hindu nationalist" and I will saay it is nothing short of terrorism and the world and the country will ultimately realise this.
What happened in Germany in the 1930's? The Nazis emerged as a force of German nationalism and were against Communism. Systematically they destroyed all opposition and then went on to terrorise the world.
Similar pattern is being observed in India albeit in a different form.
BJP is winning in States of India. Then they are taking certain steps which solidify their prescence. Like they won in Gujarat and now they just keep winning. Similarly in MP and Chattisgarh. By trial and error they know how to entrench themselves. Similarly they are entrenching themselves in the states they won recently like Maharashtra, Jharkhand, Haryana, Rajasthan. They do not want to lose these states again and hence they are taking radical steps.
They know if they win in the states they are truly in power. They know if they are in power no body can challenge them as official machinery is with them. Their ultimate aim is to win Bihar and UP and in Bengal they want to win ultimately if not in 2016 then in 2021.
Thus who are the true enemies of the country? That has to be pondered. If you've seen the movie Bodysnatchers you will know about it. These Hindu nationalists are like them. What is said in the movie is true. "Where are you gonna run, Where are you gonna hide, 'coz there is no one like you left".

2 Movies

Have further watched two movies which are as below:
Welcome Back: Watched this movie on the laptop.
Enjoyed it thoroughly. Diverse actors make it a cocktail and enjoyable.
Exodus: Gods and Kings
My God what a movie this is. Based on Moses story. You have got to watch it twice to get its essence. I watched it on Tata Sky Showcase Channel and so could watch it twice (because it repeats itself in a day).
The guy playing Ramses has done a tremendous job. How Moses could not be at peace with his family and had to go after his people is also excellent. The last 30 minutes of the movie is more than excellent when the sea gives way.

Brownie Point in Vegeterianism

I will say people who chose to be vegetarian do this with the hope that they will get "brownie points".
Now what is brownie point?
"An amount of credit considered as earned, especially by favorably impressing one having power or influence." That is what I have got from google.
Now who is in ultimate power?
Most of the believers will say it is God or by whatever name we may call Him.
Thus people will say we become vegetarian to impress God so that he will look upon us with pity and do favour for us in our day to day lives.
Similarly there is the system of days the week my earlier post.
Each day of the week is allotted to a particular deity and even the days of the week are named after those who control time and our lives.
Thus by becoming vegetarian on Monday people want to impress Lord Shiva or the Moon God and so on.
Some people stretch it a little further and do "fast" i.e. the leave food altogether on their chosen days.
Thus it is the belief of the people which directs their actions. It has less to do with the facts which may be known through a scientific manner.
It is actually people what they feel in their hearts or what they are conditioned to believe in due to their spiritual masters (Gurus) or religious books or customary practices happening over decades or centuries.
Thus it is selfish interest of people which makes them vegetarian. There may be some who abhor violence against animals and chose vegetarianism but the fact is being vegetarian involves killing plants and boiling plants and frying plants which are living things. So where does one draw the line?
Thus there should be no imposition of vegetarianism or prohibiting people from having animal meat like beef. Muslims are prohibited to have pork because a pig is unclean but Hindus not having beef makes no sense especially when they personally do not mind.
It is personal choice of an individual and for Muslims and Christians and other castes it will be part of their dietary requirement. Several people will not be knowing what to have apart from this. Thus there should be no prohibition of any food and "freedom of choice" should be available.
If someone wants 'brownie points' he is fully entitled to not have meat and be vegetarian but if one does not believe in this crap and wants to have meat should be allowed.

Large Swathes of territory

Recently our PM Modi has remarked with sadness about how people and non-state elements hold "large swathes of territory" and indulge in violent acts.
I will say what is RSS. The leader of the party of BJP, the RSS also hold swathes over large portion of territory. Let us try to do an analysis.
Below are the 29 states of India along with the area:

State	Area (sq kms)
Uttar Pradesh	2,40,928
Maharashtra	3,07,713
Bihar	94,163
West Bengal	88,752
Madhya Pradesh	3,08,245
Tamil Nadu	1,30,058
Rajasthan	3,42,239
Karnataka	1,91,791
Gujarat	1,96,024
Andhra Pradesh	1,60,205
Odisha	1,55,707
Telangana	1,14,840
Kerala	38,863
Jharkhand	79,714
Assam	78,438
Punjab	50,362
Chhattisgarh	1,35,191
Haryana	44,212
Jammu and Kashmir	2,22,236
Uttarakhand	53,483
Himachal Pradesh	55,673
Tripura	10,486
Meghalaya	22,429
Manipur	22,327
Nagaland	16,579
Goa	3,702
Arunachal Pradesh	83,743
Mizoram	21,081
Sikkim	7,096
Total Area	32,76,280

BJP (&RSS) is in power in the following mentioned states and let us for one second forget the states where BJP ally is in power.

States (in alphabetical order)	Area (sq kms)
Chhattisgarh	1,35,191
Goa	3,702
Gujarat	1,96,024
Haryana	44,212
Jharkhand	79,714
Madhya Pradesh	3,08,245
Maharashtra	3,07,713
Rajasthan	3,42,239

Thus BJP-RSS combine is in control of area 1.4 million square kms out of almost 3.2 million square kms of India. And let it be remembered that it is a contiguous land area. Almost 50% of India it can be said.
Now that is "large swathe of territory" to put it in PM words where the BJP and RSS virtually have a "free hand" and can do whatever they want. What about it?

Agneepath 2012

I have watched this movie just once and that too on the net somewhere in 2013. I have not watched it twice and do not intend to watch it again.
But it got released around Republic Day, 2012 and I will say that this movie is one of the most violent movies especially against Muslims.
The director I think is Karan Malhotra, the same guy who has directed Brothers.
Now how is it anti-Muslim movie. Let us list down the points.

1. It shows an orphan (the hero) who is Hindu but joins Muslim anti-socials. And the concept that "All will find refuge in God(Allah)" is defeated as his core values remain anti Muslim.
2. Our hero goes on to kill the sons of the "main guy" who is Muslim. But keeps a 'retarded son' alive who becomes the inheritor of the wealth when the hero kills the main villain. Thus it suits Hindus to keep retarded persons in charge of affairs of Muslims whereas eliminate the "size matters opposition". It is same for Americans and Israelis. Israelis also eliminate men in Palestinian territory and then go after the opposition remaining who are women and children and elderly. US invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq was also on the same format. the eliminate the powerful opposition and keep the not-so-powerful or retarded people in power who will work for their interests. In other words, Agneepath movie shows the "regime change" which is followed by US and NATO.
3. The movie shows flesh trade where women are traded as a commodity. It shows Muslims engaging in the practice. Thus it shows Muslims in bad light. It negates the concept that Muslim religion has respect for women and that is why there is Burqa in Islam. Else it shows even worse thing. It shows that Muslim people treat Hindu women badly whereas they treat their own women very well. Also it shows the hero as the savior of women where he takes charge and then frees all the women. Thus it shows that a Hindu hero however anti-social he may be never does anything bad to women.
4. The original Agneepath movie villain is made a secondary villain in the 2012 Agneepath movie. Also that Villain it seems is equally a villain for the hero but allows the hero to go after the "uplifted villain" in this new movie. So it shows when it comes to Muslims or Muslim villain the Hindu hero and Hindu villain can come together.
5. The main villain is killed very badly and while uttering very good Shayari. "Shayari" is a past time of educated people in Hindi-Urdu culture. People spend their entire weekends and evening listening to Shayari or taking part in the Shayari marathons. Thus, all those people who do Shayari should be looked as villains and that is what the film shows. While many sidekicks of the villain are shot, this main villain is killed by hand in the most barbaric fashion.
6. Many Arab people are shown to be shot by the hero. Mainly those who came to trade in the commodity shown in the movie, Indian women. Thus it shows not to give Indian women to Muslims in general and Arabs in particular. Here, the director thinks that Indian women are very precious. But the fact is it is not so. Even if such trade is made official no one Arab would be interested.

That is all I can remember. I may have forgotten certain points. But just think what this movie will have effect on kids. I am sure kids who watch this movie will be deeply disturbed. And Hritik Roshan as a chocolate boy image is destroyed. This is not improvement I feel. This is 'de-improvement'.
Also what I feel that you can replace the Muslim Characters in the movie with Christians and the movie will still be valid. Instead of Arabs you can show Europeans and the movie will still be valid. And hence, what this movie essentially has shown is anti-Minority mentality. In Brothers movie also, the same director has shown a guy from Brazil, Pedro (white) getting killed after being getting stuck in the head in a MMA match. Also, in the case of an Italian opponent he gets hammered by the hero to oblivion. Thus in Agneepath, though the intention of the director could have been to show Christians/Whites he may have agreed to show Muslims after convincing by certain elements who wished to show Muslims in a bad light.
Original Agneepath never showed this difference and violence. It made a South Indian as villian along with others as well as it showed another South Indian as a side-hero.

Beef Ban Consequence

I will say what the BJP-RSS combine has done in Maharashtra by banning beef i.e. male cattle (bull and calf) slaughter is a tragedy. How is it a tragedy? I will draw the results from what I read an article in Times of India Paper today.

• First they outlaw something which was prevalant since long time. So people who are involved in the trade lose their livelihood and source of income plus they do not provide alternate employment avenues.
• They permit slaughter of buffaloes. They should realise that buffaloes are not plenty across the length and breadth of the country. Mainly buffaloes require plenty of water where they can escape the Indian heat. You must have heard "Gayi Bhais Pani Mein". It means for a long time the bhains i.e. the buffoalo will now remain in the water. So I had read somewhere that now farmers will find it prudent to switch from cows and bulls to buffaloes. So indirectly, the BJP and RSS is responsible for making bulls and cows (It makes no sense for a farmer to keep cows without the bulls) extinct in the Indian landscape. Farmer will find it more profitable to rear buffaloes. They are morally responsible for making bulls disappear from Indian landscape. It is same as making a species extinct in the wild.
• During drought, farmers find it difficult to make ends meet. Already the farmers would be deep in debt. When they are unable to produce from the lands from where can they feed their farm animals when they and their families face hunger and starvation. And when Govt banned cattle trade they cannot sell those as well. So their cattle die either from hunger and starvation or they the farmers would be poisoning them. Certainly if a farmer can commit suicide by drinking poison what is a big deal to him to poison his cattle.
• Again when the cattle die (more during drought), I am sure no one does "Antim Samskar" for them like humans. Basically in Hinduism the human corpse is burnt and destroyed and too much of wood is used. Again this wood can only be available after cutting of trees which is scarce anyways. And destruction of trees and forests lead to dry situation and drought plus floods both. Trees and forests provide the humidity for clouds to be sustained and cause precipitation or rains. Now for cattle they would be burying the dead instead of burning. Now what happens, the remains of cows will decompose and degrade and when rains happen, it would percolate down to ground water level and the same people will be pumping out or getting through tube wells. So the BJP-RSS motive of keeping the cow and bull as God is defeated because the decompose portion finds it way to the water table and gets consumed by humans.
• Will a farmer watch his cattle die in front of his eyes, that itself may cause him to lose his mind and commit suicide or will he sell it to people who will find every possible use from the cattle and farmer will find it proud and remains of cattle will also find use. The farmer can make money. He knows his efforts would have borne the fruit. Rather than contaminating the environment, the meat would be eaten or exported. By products from cattle like Skin can be used in leather, bones would be used in fertilizer or medicine production (We do not know where all they can be used). I am only speculating. Which is better?

Like I said BJP-RSS cannot solve any problems in the nation. They can only create distraction, diversion and divide and rule and loot the country in the process.