Mulayam Comments

Now the Press has got a new target to attack. And that person is Mulayam. Yes what I read from the reports that Mulayam has said that it is wrong for 'death penalty to be handed over for an act like rape'.
For this now, press will leap and attack and now will not rest till the target is destroyed. I just hate the Press for this. Much like many cases before, the Press is like US/UK/France/NATO when it decides to attack.
They simply bomb the shit out of their enemies.
There is not much difference between the US led invasions and the Press.
The Press also does not care about collateral damage. Any person who reads the Press articles become their target and is collateral damage. He gets mentally damaged by the Press.
Tell me we can see many clips on internet. We have seen the act of "making love". These clips are what are known as 'porn clips'. In this we can see often many times it is a woman who initiates and does the act. Also, in almost all clips women are shown to 'enjoy the act'.
Now, we know several men are 'unable to sustain themselves' and hence medicines like Viagra and Penegra are available so that men can carry on gracefully during their act. [I have also taken these drugs to make myself effective and hence speaking through personal experience as well.]
It is well known that men who are able to rape are able to 'sustain themselves'. What the Press wants or the Female led Zionists want is that 'men who are being men' should die. They want men to unable to sustain themselves and they want men to get hooked to drugs for sustaining themselves.
Any person who is able to 'do the act' is like a 'threat to these Female Zionists' who fear for their dominance role in the society and hence 'should die' through death penalty or whatever.
For this reason only the Nirbhaya rape case was bombarded upon the hapless public by the Zionist controlled Press and tough laws were enacted to give death penalty for rape.
But tell me when is rape a rape and when is rape not consensual sex. Like is a man or woman or a boy or girl agree to have sex and then the girl changes her mind than it is forced what happens then? In that case what this Zionist Press will say that it is rape. But I will say it was consensual sex. Like we buy a ticket and then decide not to travel or watch the movie, the loss is yours and yours alone. You cannot ask for refund.
Similarly for rape case it is like that.
When it is rape and murder I agree for the death penalty. But punishing a man with death for only rape is like punishing a man for being a "man" or being a man able to 'sustain himself' or 'being skilled in the act of sex' or being virile. For these female Zionists and Press controlled by them, all men should be like impotent so that they can rule the world without any obstruction to their power.
Recently, we saw how in Mumbai, repeat offenders for rape were handed the death penalty. It is wrong. The girl ventured to a remote place. She was asking for it. A man who is impotent may not be able to do anything but a man who is virile will get motivated to do something. Thus we are punishing man for being virile and it is wrong according to me. I agree a man should channel his virility on 'constructive matters' and not for 'rape'. But giving death penalty is simply not acceptable.
Much like Viagra drug enhances the virility, there are drugs which reduce ones sexual drive. According to me these drugs can be given. Any other punishment like death or some suggest castration shows "Barbaric mentality" and we as a society should guard against it.

Modi/Azam

It has come in the news that Modi is married, I will ask what do Modi supporters have to say?
According to me it only goes to show that Modi is a big liar and was hiding the fact all along. And that only shows his character. It shows that Modi was a 'bachelor by choice'. Even when married he just 'got rid of his wife' and was leading celibate life by choice.
We do not know how his wife was separated but it is likely that he himself 'threw her out of his life' and I will say for what? For power and dominance and forcing his authority on hapless people. For running a campaign of 'hateful Hindutva' in which thousands of Muslims were massacred and millions of Muslims now live in fear.
For these hardcore Hindutva fanatics they will say that there is no place in India for them (Muslims). They will say that Muslims please go to Pakistan. And then these Hindus will only spread hate and propaganda that Muslim migrants from India are not respected in Pakistan and are known as 'Muhajirs'.
These double standards of these hardcore Hindus just drive me sick.
Modi is like such a hateful face of Hindutva personified.
Also Hindus from India divided Pakistan into what is now Pakistan and Bangladesh due to hatred for Muslims. And now they know 'poor country' Bangladesh has 'nothing new to offer' and hence their hatred is now directed towards Pakistan.
Modi if comes to power will spread hatred and anarchy across the land. He will not offer cushion that Vajpayee offered. Rather he will provide spikes like cactus.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meanwhile Azam Khan comment that Kargil was won by Muslims must be seen in context. What he was trying to say that "Muslims from India are for India and not for Pakistan and please Hindus don't brand Muslims from India as Pakistanis and want them to go to Pakistan. India has a lot to offer to Muslims and Pakistan has nothing to offer". Tell me is it that difficult for the Press to understand. Why can't they make out such a simple meaning? Rather they misinterpret it and go on harping over it again and again.
The Press do not want peace between Hindus and Muslims. Press is also guilty of dividing Hindus and Muslims. By being the 'very vocal but unofficial' mouth of Modi who has bought the Press with big money from Indian industrialists, the Press must be prosecuted for its task of 'divide and rule' by misreporting and misguiding and carrying 'hateful propaganda'.

Russia vs West

This is a new conflict which has emerged.
What happened earlier there was West and NATO and other side there was Soviet Union.
Ultimately it was West which won which happened with the fall of Berlin Wall and unity of Germany. West Germany just swallowed East Germany and East Germany ceased to exist.
Russia fell into bits, or rather old Soviet Union fell into bits and fifteen different countries emerged.
Initially Russia was on its knees and unable to do anything meaningful in this world.
West carried on its 'crusade of world domination' relentlessly. Countries after countries were invaded and occupied. Starting with Algeria, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Bahrain, Iraq, Yemen, Afghanistan, Libya among many other countries. Let us also not forget Serbia and Kosovo which were Russian allies.
But in 2013 August Russia took a stand against Syrian invasion. No longer it would tolerate Western hegemony and domination which involved killing millions of people in the name of 'liberation, freedom and democracy'. Then when things began to spin out of control in Ukraine, Russia took over Crimea.
Crimea is that region of the world where a Western alliance had fought severe war in the 1800's.
This shows Western countries are nothing but a bunch of goons or rowdies who come together to teach a lesson to one they don't like.
And let us not speak of Turkey, Turkey is also like a Western poodle dog and so is Pakistan. Both are in the laps of the West and NATO ever since the beginning of modern history. We can say Modern history began after 1945 i.e. end of Second World War.
My opinion- I am totally against Western hegemony. We are trained in school in English medium and hence English comes naturally to most of us in India. India was a colonial poodle of Britain or England and hence English is the major language here.
But given an alternate choice I will want to forget all the English and maybe learn a language like Russian or Chinese or Arabic or Persian and chart a new course for myself. What I mean to say that just because English is the only 'international' language we can converse in let us not think that we are same as the British or American. We are different or at least I can say that for myself.
Due to circumstances happened in past over which I had not control due to being a child I am fluent in English but I hate what present day West led by US and UK and France are upto.

Jaziya/ Experience in My Life

Jaziya is a form of tax which is payable by non-Muslims in a Muslim dominated society to make sure that they are able to continue their activities in a normal manner.
It is not applicable to Muslims because Muslims due to their religion are anyway obligated to contribute a portion of their wealth to poor and needy.
Non-Muslims are able to live on as Non-Muslims and enjoy all benefits accorded to Muslims by paying Jaziya.
Today, in Times of India paper one article/editorial has come out as to how in independent India, Muslims are the "guardians of secularism" in India and the system of Jaziya has turned on its head and now Muslims are paying Jaziya to maintain secularism in India and this Jaziya is their 'vote' or 'power to vote' or 'power to vote as a bloc'.
In my life I was unaware of the system of Jaziya for much of my student life. But now looking back I feel the fees we pay to get our education is like a Jaziya. Few months back I read an entry in Best gore site where Mark Marek had mentioned how there was a story about paying a coin to cross a river after death.

Pay a coin
This coin which is being paid to Charon is actually Jaziya. Though it is only "a coin" or one coin still it needs to be paid as we remain forever in trouble if not paid. But pay the coin and you are able to cross to the other side.
Also, in my life while doing work in my previous company, I used to go by bike or car and then due to work pressure went by bus. When we go by bus what happens we pay the conductor some money and then buy a ticket. This 'ticket' is also like Jaziya.
Later to avoid change problems means that the conductor demands change money and avoid payment daily, I took bus pass. The bus pass involved payment of money at one stroke and then travel for entire month without any payment provided you have the pass in person at the time of travel. This was Jaziya according to me. But my previous manager and the person who took my interview thought that I did not needed to pay Jaziya or they thought that payment by bus pass as Jaziya was not enough. I needed to give my heart and soul as well and hence they transferred me from Electronics City to M4 office located at Garvebhavipalya.
Just payment for Jaziya was not enough for me they thought.
If you look at that M4 office, it is located just below that big flyover. Check my blog entry.
Hosur Road flyover
That flyover is a 'paid flyover', in other words any person using that flyover needs to pay a tax which is like 'Jaziya'. I was supposed to work below that flyover and no need to pay any Jaziya but I had to suffer watching others moving around in cars and buses to-and-fro on that flyover after they paid the 'Jaziya'.
In other words I was put in position where I need not have paid Jaziya but I had to suffer watching others move around after they paid the Jaziya. I was denied the chance to pay the dues due by me which was 'Jaziya'. In other words I was to suffer indefinitely. Thus I left the organization.
Coming to think about it, if the flyover was free to use, I might not have left my organization. People not paying the 'Jaziya' but still using the flyover would have implied that it is Govt. which cares for them and does not 'suck them dry'.
Now looking back we can call the taxes we pay to Govt. as well as the 'Hafta collected shown in movies' is like Jaziya. While anything which Govt. collects is sanctioned by law and is legal others become illegal. Also with Govt. collecting so much, ordinary people often have no funds at disposal to pay any "Jaziya" elsewhere. The Govt. in turn ensures you are able to carry your activities normally.

BJP Manifesto

The BJP has come out with its manifesto and I feel the worst thing is the Ban of Cow Slaughter.
I feel that people should have the freedom to decide what they want to eat.
My Earlier Post
Also, even vegetarians are killing plants to feed themselves. Tell me is that not a sin. We also do not know if plants feel any pain or not. For all we know plants could be feeling pain when they are being cut and boiled.
If that is true than killing plants is even a greater sin than killing animals as plants are unable to protest 'acts of violence' against them.
They take the act of killing silently as they are thrashed around and husked, de-husked, processed, bagged, refrigerated and sold.
Why is no beef product available in McDonalds or in Malls or in Chinese restaurants in India. I feel this is denial of "Right to Food" or Right to Eat what we like. Do Chinese people not eat beef?
World over we can know that McDonalds or Pizza Hut or Chinese restaurants would be serving beef dishes. Why deny the choice to Indian people. Tell me will Indian people never get the chance to eat these items in posh malls. They will have to suffice with Chicken. Okay make Chicken available along with others. Let people decide what they want to eat.
In Bangalore, I find that only place where we can have beef is in Muslim areas and their restaurants. In any other restaurant it is simply not available. Why is it like that. I my earlier post above, I have outlined as to how the Christian community in India is being forced to consume pork which is one of the 'uncleanest of the animals'. This is only to avoid any friction with the majority Hindus.
And BJP if it comes to power will definitely want to force its Hindutva based agenda on the entire country. Like it has outlawed cow slaughter in majority of states where it came to power, it will do or try to do the same thing if it wins at national level. Tell me rather then outlawing it, one should regulate it and permit it to be done in a hygienic manner so that people are able to exercise their right to food or right to eat what they want.

Gullu Dada, Beard-Mustache

I watched one more movie and that is "Gullu Dada 4". This is a Hyderabadi movie with Hyderabadi language used in the movie and I will say I liked it.
This is alternate Cinema and is very much welcome. Though movies from Bombay will be 1000 times bigger than this, but still the world is poorer without such alternate movie industry. And people I am not talking about Telugu movie. This is Hyderabadi language in the movie which is slightly different than Hindi.
Recently, I saw a documentary on DD Loksabha Channel about the Malegaon film industry. Similarly we can say the same about this 'Gullu Dada movie'. This alternate movie industry work hard and give movies which appeal the mental frames of their 'clientele'. It is not like 'one size fits all'. Definitely some change is required to make stuff acceptable to variety of peoples.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beard-Mustache = Husband-Wife
I will say that the relationship between Beard and Moustache is like one between husband and wife.
Now which is the husband and which is the wife?
I will say the beard is the wife and mustache is the husband. Why? Because we find a lot of so called 'men' who want to show off their masculinity sport a mustache and so by default the mustache is a 'man' and the husband. The beard is the wife because the beard occupies a 'good portion of the face' just like a wife begins to occupy a good portion of ones life after marriage.
A mustache sported man often shaves his beard or in other words 'gets rid of it'. A man also when he is 'gainfully employed' leaves his house and goes out of his house for several hours and works to make a living. Thus for a few hours at least he gets rid of his wife though this 'getting rid of' is actually done by him. He does the act of getting rid of himself from the house which he leaves it to his wife or family and he himself goes to work.
Now you will say what about a clean shaven man or one who sports only a beard. One who sports only a beard is a kind of man who respects women as beard is the wife as discussed above. And he does not have a mustache and so he has got rid of the man i.e. the husband. Thus he places greater emphasis on the wife and so is a respect giver to women.
One who is clean shaven is the most dangerous and is the sort of human being who is like a commando. As he does not have both mustache as well as beard and thus he can go any way he like. He has got 'freedom of movement'. He can support both women and men as well as either men or women or neither man and woman. But he is like 'the man' as he can chart an 'independent course' for himself.

Bigg Boss Host

People I have once again began watching the Bigg Boss series. And since I have watched the entire Bigg Boss 7 series, I do not need to watch it again. What I was watching earlier was Bigg Boss 6 which was telecast in 2012. Then I faced the first weekend show of Salman and his 'over-dominating prescence' and then I deleted the shows I had downloaded. Then what I did I began watching Bigg Boss 3 season which was telecast in 2009 and the host was Amitabh Bachchan.
What I found that Amitabh is a far better host than Salman. Salman is kind of "dominating host". Maybe since Salman is half-Muslim and not a pure Hindu and the originators as well as controllers of Bigg Boss are based in Europe they want a sort of person who can dominate the Hindus and Salman is also not a pure non-Hindu. He is half-Hindu. Thus Salman becomes acceptable to both Hindus as well as non-Hindus.
I am also watching Bigg Boss 6 as well and I have found out the best way to avoid the domineering presence of Salman and that is by not watching the weekend shows. What happens every weekend Salman appears in two shows, and I will simply skip it and that is what I have decided. That way I will be able to achieve twin purposes, avoid Salman and watch Bigg Boss at the same time.
I will suggest the Bigg Boss show owners and controllers that please select a proper host for Bigg Boss 8.
Ranbir Kapoor is not a perfect choice. Definitely he would be a change but I feel he would not be able to handle it. Who else? I will suggest as below:

• Arshad Warsi- This guy hosted the first ever Bigg Boss and can be a perfect host.
• Amitabh Bachchan- He can host provided he agrees and the age permits him.
• Abhishek Bachchan- He can be a good host I feel. If not the father than why not the son.
• Javed Jaffrey- I will say he will be a perfect host of Bigg Boss and will do the work at a fraction of cost of others.
• Kapil Sharma- Kapil can host Bigg Boss I feel. I mean he handles "Comedy Nights" and Bigg Boss will be like they say 'left hand work' for him.
• Manish Paul- Manish can also be a very good host. He has proved that time and again.
• Ranvir Singh- Ranvir Singh could be the host had come in reports and he can well be a very good one.
• Ajay Devgan- It will be welcome to find Ajay Devgan as a host. Reports also came out earlier.
• Shah Rukh Khan- If the producers can afford him or if he has the time then he would also be good host.
• Akshay Kumar- Provided the channel can afford him, he would be a good host as well.
• Sanjay Dutt- If he gets out of jail than he can be the host as well.

Presently, I am able to think only as above. I feel these people can host and prove to be better than Salman. But much like the contestants, the host once chosen cannot be changed. Rather than going for 'very expensive' and 'dominating' Salman, the Colors channel can save money by going for another host.
Also we find, under Salman only women are winning the Bigg Boss seasons. This is due to the 'ever-dominating nature of Salman' who not only ensures that he remains the 'hero and no hero is able to emerge in front of him' but also he wants the 'women to win and remain forever indebted to him'.